Sovereignty is often discussed as a political or social state, but its true foundation is epistemological. To be a sovereign is to carry the weight of what you know without the crutch of external consensus. In this entry of Logometric Arcana for a Sovereign, I am stepping away from the theoretical to address the visceral: the reality of perceiving simultaneous streams of information—intentions, events, and echoes—that the world is not yet ready to acknowledge. Readers can expect a blunt exploration of what happens when you stop seeking "empirical justification" from a world that is fundamentally slippery, and instead choose to go all in on your own internal signal, the strength required to live in a world that never stops broadcasting.
I am going to be blunt about this. 10,20,30 years ago I would not have been.
People.
The First Shockwave
The first time I was aware of seeing things—knowing things—I was very young. It started with minor observations. Others seemed to have fewer thoughts, fewer observations about the world around them. Well, my world is just a bit more than others, so what?
At times I watched people and, while watching them, I seemed to be connected with them. I started to know things—without effort. It just came to me. It often felt intimidating. Like the aftermath of a shock wave.
The Slippery Fish of Truth
Now, how could I know that it was real? The Truth?
Setting up different venues to find empirical justification? Sure, if was inclined to share it with the world. Ten setups, confirmed and solid, gave me the confidence that the setup worked for something, but the Truth was still out there—like a fish in the sea. Slippery. Constantly moving. Constantly adjusting.
During my time of heavy exploration—extrem long meditation to see the future—I was able to follow the fish. I followed simultaneous streams of events and developments. But as soon as I would follow one particular stream, I would lose it. I felt it. I knew. I would get stuck in a projection because I had made a choice to follow one path.
The future doesn’t care about my choices. If I wanted to see the future, I had to grow enough inner strength to have no inclination to follow one stream. Later, I learned how to follow one stream: my own. My derivation was that the truth had nothing to do with my choice. My choice would only limit what I was able to receive.
Let that sink in for a minute.
The Descartes Decision: All In
I have no idea, no confidence if my observations are solid predictions of the future, but I keep seeing things that eventually—next hour, next day, person, week—materialize.
My solution: Go all in. Consider René Descartes and his "Evil Demon" experiment. If this life is actually one mean-spirited movie, then the only goal is to get out. The only way out is to play the game—all in. I made that decision when I was twelve years old. At the time, I didn’t know Descartes, but decades later I wondered how he came up with that thought experiment. (I wrote a paper on him; I might post it here).
* update: the paper is integrated in a piece I wrote with the title: Re-Evaluation of the Foundation.
The Logic of Silence
Going "all in" means shutting the world off (let's call it the classic Descartes move). Go deep and be open to receive whatever is coming. But keep in mind: talk to anyone—no can do. The attempt at confirmation is a sign of both internal and external problems:
Internally: To seek confirmation is to question your own validity without even trying to investigate, test, or embrace. If I don’t have the trust in myself to pull this through, the world means nothing.
Externally: What would I expect? If someone walked up to me and claimed that in an hour I would say a specific sentence or be with a specific person, and it happened? Awkward silence. If it didn't happen? Awkward silence.
Knowing and acting upon what you know are two entirely different animals.
Knowing without sharing makes you a Witness.
Knowing and sharing makes you an Idiot. A dangerous idiot.
The Broadcast That Never Ends
Back to the pursuit of knowing, then. Listening, receiving what others feel or think, experiencing their childhoods, connecting at will to someone’s intentions—it is like watching TV for the first time or listening to the radio.
I can walk away, but wherever I go, it is never quiet. I never learned to turn it off. I never thought about learning to turn it off. It pops up unannounced: a person 60 miles away, two days ahead, or a week in the past. It is always lurking, waiting for a window of full disclosure.
Nothing in this world ever stops. There is no time to just be alone with time.
WHAT did we learn today?
Premises of a formal syllogism
* Logic dictates a move from the nature of the world (the construct) to the method of perception (the silent witness).
Arcana I: The Sovereign’s Prerogative
To accept the possibility of a 'Mean-Spirited Movie' is not an act of cynicism; it is the ultimate act of autonomy. If the world is a construct of a Malicious Demon, the only way to break the script is to stop seeking its approval. The Sovereign does not ask if the broadcast is 'true'—they simply choose to witness it without being consumed by it.
Arcana II: The Limit of Choice
Descartes sought a foundation that could not be shaken. For the Sovereign, that foundation is the silence of the witness. Your personal choice is the static that disrupts the signal. To see the future, or the Truth of another, you must first strip away the inclination to follow your own desires. Only then does the 'fish' stop being slippery.
The Conclusion: The Law of the Silent Sovereign
Therefore, the ultimate state of sovereignty is the internal synthesis of absolute perception and absolute silence; to know the stream without interfering with it is the only way to remain outside the "movie" while playing the game.
Validation is Entrapment.
If you seek to confirm what you see (Premise 1) or choose which "fish" to follow (Premise 2), you are no longer a Sovereign—you have become a character in the play again. The only "way out" is to carry the weight of certainty in total, unspoken isolation.
No comments:
Post a Comment